Every act of kindness is a rebellion against a cruel, indifferent world.
āVisakan Veerasamy
š£š£š£ Poll results on Discord vs Slack so far:
Iām letting this ācommunity treehouseā (š” ha!) idea swirl around my head a bitā¦
I think it could be really cool, but it would have to be clear what it is, and what it *isnāt*, because thereās a failure more here where I accidentally create something that takes way too much of my time, and I donāt really have much spare time right now.
The #1 goal would be for readers to find each other ā because you guys & gals are fantastic and I think youād get along really well and enrich each otherās lives ā not to create a direct line of communication to me where a kind of 24/7 āask me anythingā would take place, with me expected to see and reply to everything with thoughtful and fully-fleshed out responsesā¦
Thatās just too much pressure and I just donāt have the bandwidth for that.
But as long as everybody understood that this would be a lighthouse for like-minded people ā to use David Perellās (āļø) turn of phrase ā where I just also happen to hang out, and there are no expectations on anyoneā¦
I think it could be pretty great and lots of fun. š¤
š¦ Back when Twitter bought Revue and there was huge buzz about it as a Substack competitor I created an account to have a look.
The hot take I kept hearing at the time was āmaybe they donāt have quite the features that Substack has, but their distribution through Twitter is a huge advantage and may help them winā.
To be honest, I had kind of forgotten about Revue since. It doesnāt look like Twitter pushed it much, and I almost never find newsletters that I want to read that are published on Revue (I think my only exception is for friend-of-the-show and supporter (š š„) Bill Brewsterās nl).
Iām not sure what happened, but Revue certainly doesnāt seem to be a priority at Twitter. Substack has improved by leaps and bounds in the 20 months that Iāve been on it, and my Revue account seems exactly the same as when I first signed up. Iām sure they added things, but nothing jumps at me.
Probably another example of the power of focus: Substackās whole purpose is to create a good home for writers. Twitter has 45 different priorities, and newsletters probably arenāt in the top 5.
Too bad, because I want to see Twitter succeed, and Iād like to see more competition for Substack ā I think it would push them and increase the pace of innovation in the space generally.
Maybe if Elon Musk starts caring about newsletters something will happenā¦
ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
š„ š„ āØļø I tried to stress-test the M1 Max in my Mac Studio by running some computational biology workloads on it, and it took anything I could throw at it like a champ, even x86 code ran fine through the Rosetta2 translation software (from x86 ā ARM).
The best part is: Even when all 10 CPU cores are pegged to 100%, the fans donāt spin up and the air coming out from the vents in the back is barely warmer than usual.
That thing is ridiculously efficient!
Hereās a good āfirst impressionā review.
š š„ If you make justĀ oneĀ good decisionĀ per yearĀ because of something you learn here (or avoid one bad decision ā donāt forget aboutĀ preventing negatives!), it'll pay for multiple years of subscriptions (or multiple lifetimes).
And the first good decision is to become a supporter š
A Word From Our Sponsor: āļø Tegus āļø
What makes a great investor isnāt pedigree or diplomasĀ š, itās quality thinking and informationĀ š§
Tegus canāt provide the thinking for you, but on the information front, theyāve got you covered!Ā š
With 25,000+ primary source expert calls covering almost any industry or company you may want to learn about, and the ability to conduct your own calls with experts, if you so choose, at a much lower cost than youāll find elsewhere (70% lower than the average cost of Ė$400), this isĀ theĀ service to turbo-charge the depth and breadth of your knowledgeĀ š
āļø Get your FREE trial at Tegus.co/Liberty āļø
Investing & Business
Instead of investing in IBM 2.0 HP, Buffett should invest in⦠Texas Instruments š¤
With the caveats that Buffett is much smarter and a much better investor than I am, that Iām not following HP (because š„±), and that this isnāt really a pitch but rather just a random musing:
Iām surprised that Buffett went for HP. Seems like another IBM, an old business that isnāt really riding any strong S-curves anymore and is trying to financialize its way to better stock performance (pulling a Bob Swan, if you will) rather than focusing on innovation and technical leadership to create tomorrowās products and services that will replace todayās declining ones (in tech, things can change fast, and with mediocre businesses, the surprises tend to be negative and the declines tend to be non-linear and faster than you expect).
That said, thereās a price for everything, and maybe Buffett will do great on HP and itāll turn out how he expected IBM to turn out originally (HP stock certainly has done better than IBM in the past decade)ā¦
ā¦but it made me think that thereās a business in the tech sector that seems a perfect fit for Buffett: Texas Instruments (disclosure: I own some).
Itās large enough to deploy plenty of capital into (one of Buffettās biggest constraints these days ā his universe of investable companies isnāt that large), has impeccable capital allocation and is a very durable business that is highly diversified by end-market and geography, has all kinds of tailwinds and competitive advantages, and a clear line of sight to highly profitable growth as far as the eye can see (theyāre making big manufacturing investments right now that should pay off for a long time).
Iām sure Buffett could understand it if he wanted to, at least at a higher level, like he did with Apple (donāt need to know all the details of the M1ās on-die unified memory architecture to get itā¦).
Sure, it sells for a higher multiple than HP, but it deserves a much higher multiple than HP and it isnāt that expensive for its quality (around a market multiple).
If youāre not familiar with TI and what makes it different from most other semiconductor companies, this Chit Chat Money episode is a good 101:
But I guess if weāre discussing this, we can probably discuss why he never pulled the trigger on Google and Amazon (there were times in recent years when they got pretty cheap). In fact, this brings me toā¦
Speculation: What if Buffett hadnāt made Microsoft āoff-limitsā because of his friendship with Bill Gates š¤š
Itās interesting to speculate that if Warren Buffett didnāt care about the appearance of conflict from buying Microsoft when his friend Bill Gates ran it, Berkshire would probably have bought 10%+ of Microsoft sometime in the 90s and held it until today, possibly buying more along the way during dislocations.
Who knows, maybe Berkshire would own 20%+ of Microsoft and that alone (including decades of dividends re-invested at Buffettās long-term CAGR) would be worth a large fraction of todayās market cap, if not more than todayās market cap.
Interesting āwhat ifā.
BPās predictions for the cost of wind & Solar to 2050
This will probably turn out to be just as wrong and conservative as previous forecasts (see below), but if we put that aside for a moment, itās still quite something to see that energy sources that are already quite cheap and have already fallen by 95%+ over the past few decades are projected to fall another 20-40% in the next 5 years.
If I had to bet, Iāll take the over on these numbers.
The question will be more about other things, like scaling up storage (as I previously posted about in edition #264, the cost of batteries is on a similar curve), building more nuclear for baseload, investing in energy efficiency so we stop wasting so much of the energy we produce, etc.
Just because itās hilarious, hereās a chart showing actual solar PV additions (in black) vs the IEA predictions at various times:
Interview: Rob Koyfman, Koyfin CEO & Co-Founder
Supporters (š š„) can listen to the new podcast here:
Itāll go out to everyone tomorrow.
Science & Technology
š¬š§ āUK to build 8 nuclear reactors amid new energy strategyā ā¢ļø
Britain plans to build eight new nuclear reactors and expand production of wind energy as it seeks to reduce dependence on oil and natural gas from Russia [...]
The government said it wants to almost triple nuclear power generation capacity to 24 gigawatts by 2050.
Better late than never, I guessā¦
Iām seeing criticism of the plan, saying it has a bunch of long-term targets, but doesnāt do enough in the short-term to really make a difference, and doesnāt attack low-hanging fruits like efficiency (the countryās aging housing stock could use an upgrade).
š°š· South Koreaās incoming government will reverse the countryās nuclear phase-out plan ā¢ļø
South Korea has the highest density of nuclear reactors in the world, with most of its 24 reactors located at two complexes in the countryās industrial south-east.
In 2019, its reactors produced 139 terawatt-hours of electricity, making South Korea the fifth-largest nuclear power producer in the world. Nuclear accounted for 26 per cent of the countryās total electricity generation, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
Under Moonās nuclear phaseout plan, construction of plants was to be suspended while older plants were to be retired, with the aim of reducing the number of operational reactors to 17 by 2034.
š¤
ā½ļø It turns out that gas pump IT security isnāt very high⦠š“āā ļø
Thieves in Paris in 2019 took 26,000 gallons ā yes, thousand ā from multiple outlets and were believed to have made roughly $168,000 from their spree. In that case, the thieves brought in vans that carried tanks that could carry roughly 660 gallons of fuel. [...]
In June of 2017, a BP employee in New Jersey was arrested and charged with manipulating gas pump computers to steal more than $300,000.
Unlike the culprits in High Point, these thieves knew the access code for a specific brand of fuel pump, which allowed them to set the price at zero. (Source)
š¬
some gas pumps were vulnerable to takeover by hackers because there was an embedded controller in that gas pump. āThe device we investigated was not just a tiny web interface. It was an embedded box running a Linux-based controller unit that was installed with a tiny httpd server,ā Ido Naor wrote for Kaspersky.
āAccording to its manufacturer, the controllerās software is a site automation device that is responsible for managing every component of the station, including dispensers, payment terminals and more. [...]
According to Naorās work for Kaspersky, an intruder accessing a gas system could:
Shut down all fueling.
Cause fuel leakage and risk of casualties.
Change price.
Circumvent payment to steal money.
Scrape vehicle license plates and driver identities.
Halt the stationās operation, demanding a ransom in exchange.
Execute code on the controller unit.
Move freely within the gas station network.
Internet-connected gas pumps⦠What could go wrong?
This presentation from 2012 shows a bunch of other techniques to steal gas.
The IoT future is just getting started. Weāre going to see all kinds of weird things going forward.
I hope weāll start to take securing the more critical pieces more seriouslyā¦
Nvidiaās past 3 generations: Volta ā Ampere ā Hopper
AnandTech compiled the data above, which provides a nice way to compare the improvements made with each generation of recent Nvidia GPUs.
The piece goes into much more detail.
Hereās a highlight on the new in-silicon transformer engines that are now part of the ML Tensor cores:
In keeping with NVIDIAās focus on machine learning, for the Hopper architecture the company has taken a fresh look at the makeup of the ML market, and what workloads are popular and/or the most demanding on existing hardware. The winner, in this regard, has been transformers, a type of deep learning model that have risen in popularity rather quickly due to their utility in natural language processing and computer vision. Recent advancements in transformer technology, such as the GPT-3 model, along with demand from service operators for better natural language processing, have made transformers the latest big breakthrough in ML. [...]
Combined with the additional memory on H100 and the faster NVLink 4 I/O, and NVIDIA claims that a large cluster of GPUs can train a transformer up to 9x faster [...]
NVIDIA is claiming anywhere between a 16x and 30x increase in transformer inference performance on H100 versus A100. Like their training claims, this is an H100 cluster versus an A100 cluster, so memory and I/O improvements are also playing a part here, but it none the less underscores that H100ās transformer engines arenāt just for speeding up training.
The Arts & History
š¶š„ Exploding some more songs⦠Billie & Bojack
While Iām on a song exploder kick, an episode that I liked was Billie Eilish and her brother discussing how āEverything I wantedā was created, from a suicidal fantasy/nightmare to a more hopeful second half written many months later:
I also greatly enjoyed this one on the creation of the very distinctive theme from one of my favorite shows in recent years, Bojack Horseman (you can listen/watch it at the top).
This was written and performed by Mark Carney and his uncle, Ralph Carney. Mark is the drummer of the Black Keys, and itās really interesting to hear about how his uncle (who play with Tom Waits, among others) influenced his love of music, and how they have a long-distance, multi-decade collaboration, sending music back & forth.
Iād love to have a creative collaborator like thatā¦
(btw, if you havenāt seen Bojack and decide to try, know that thereās a few episodes at the beginning of season 1 that arenāt representative of the heights that the show reaches.. I think it takes them about 3 episodes to find their feet)









I have seen communities built in Slack in the past (lucky they migrated away from it) and Discord. Slack has a 10k message limit on free communities, and messages are invisible (do not appear in search or you cannot navigate through them) after. It seems 10k limit is a lot, but in fact it is not. This is quite a huge technical limitation which makes Slack objectively worse IMHO.
This prediction chart really made me think; why do we even bother to do long term projections? Itās just fake comfort of knowing and thinking about where things are headed. Plus, I imagine an employee just amending his excel sheet a bit. ;)